ECOEFICIÊNCIA NAS OPERAÇÕES INDUSTRIAIS: UM ESTUDO BIBLIOMÉTRICO
Resumo
O presente artigo realizou uma revisão sistemática da literatura em ecoeficiência na temática de operações. Para isso, o protocolo metodológico empregado para filtrar 163 artigos retirados das bases de dados Science Direct e Web of Science. 117 artigos foram analisados extensivamente com intuito de elucidar as principais abordagens. A discussão dos resultados apontou que 52,14 % dos artigos foram publicados pelo Jornal Elsevier, demonstrando sua representatividade e importância para o debate em questão. Dentre as principais abordagens, 65,81% foram de Ecologia da Ciência Ambiental, constatando um crescimento nos últimos 5 anos de estudos em ecoeficiência e produção. Portanto, conclui-se que apesar do aumento nas pesquisas, sejam poderosos para alcançar a melhoria ambiental nas indústrias, as atuais práticas ainda não são suficientes para alcançar o objetivo final de desenvolvimento sustentável e equilibrar o desenvolvimento industrial com a utilização sustentável dos recursos naturais.
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
AL‐NAJJAR, Basil; ANFIMIADOU, Aspioni. Environmental policies and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2012, 21.1: 49-59.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.713
AVADÍ, Ángel; VÁZQUEZ-ROWE, Ian; FRÉON, Pierre. Eco-efficiency assessment of the Peruvian anchoveta steel and wooden fleets using the LCA+ DEA framework. Journal of cleaner Production, 2014, 70: 118-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.047
BALL, Peter; LUNT, Peter. Lean eco-efficient innovation in operations through the maintenance organisation. International Journal of Production Economics, 2020, 219: 405- 415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.007
BARNEY, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, v. 17, n. 1, p. 99–120, 1991.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
CAIADO, R. G. G. et al. Towards sustainable development through the perspective of ecoefficiency: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 165, p. 890– 904, 2017.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.166
CARVALHO, H. et al. Modelling green and lean supply chains: An eco-efficiency perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, v. 120, p. 75–87, 2017.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.025
CUI, Shibo; WANG, Zixuan. The impact and transmission mechanisms of financial agglomeration on eco-efficiency: Evidence from the organization for economic co-operation and development economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 392: 136219.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136219
FIGGE, F.; HAHN, T. Value drivers of corporate eco-efficiency: Management accounting information for the efficient use of environmental resources. Management Accounting Research, v. 24, n. 4, p. 387–400, 2013.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.06.009
HAN, Xiaoqu, et al. Thermodynamic analysis and life cycle assessment of supercritical pulverized coal-fired power plant integrated with No. 0 feedwater pre-heater under partial loads. Journal of cleaner production, 2019, 233: 1106-1122.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.159
HU, Jing, et al. Ecological utilization of leather tannery waste with circular economy model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2011, 19.2-3: 221-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.09.018
IRIBARREN, Diego, et al. Benchmarking environmental and operational parameters through eco-efficiency criteria for dairy farms. Science of the total environment, 2011, 409.10: 1786- 1798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.013
KELLY, Joe, et al. Stated preferences of tourists for eco-efficient destination planning options. Tourism management, 2007, 28.2: 377-390.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.015
KOSKELA, M.; VEHMAS, J. Defining eco-efficiency: A case study on the finnish forest industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 21, n. 8, p. 546–566, 2012.DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.741
LAM, Jasmine Siu Lee; LAI, Kee-hung. Developing environmental sustainability by ANP- QFD approach: the case of shipping operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 105: 275-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.070
MADDEN, K. et al. Eco-efficiency: Learning module. Genebra: WBCSD, 2005.
MUNISAMY, Susila; ARABI, Behrouz. Eco-efficiency change in power plants: using a slacks-based measure for the meta-frontier Malmquist–Luenberger productivity
index. Journal of cleaner production, 2015, 105: 218-232. DOI :https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.081
ONU. Transformando nosso mundo: A agenda 2030 para o desenvolvimento sustentável. [s. l.]: ONU, 2015.
RAVI, V. Analysis of interactions among barriers of eco-efficiency in electronics packaging industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 101: 16-25.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.002
SCHOLZ, Roland W.; WIEK, Arnim. Operational Eco‐efficiency: Comparing Firms' Environmental Investments in Different Domains of Operation. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2005, 9.4: 155-170. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1162/108819805775247963
SONG, Su. Ship emissions inventory, social cost and eco-efficiency in Shanghai Yangshan port. Atmospheric Environment, 2014, 82: 288-297.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.006
TSOULFAS, Giannis T.; PAPPIS, Costas P. Environmental principles applicable to supply chains design and operation. Journal of Cleaner production, 2006, 14.18: 1593-1602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.05.021
UNITED NATIONS. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: 96th Plenary Meeting. New York: Nações Unidas, 1987.
YI, Sora; LIM, Hye Sook. Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of waste treatment facilities in Korea. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 411: 125040.
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.